Skip Navigation

Receive this page by email each issue: [Sign up for eTOCs]

Cover Image
Other Issues:
Previous Next
Contents: Volume 4, Number 5, May 2009   [Index by Author] 

Down Editorial
Down JIPLP Express
Down Current Intelligence
Down State of the Art
Down Practice Point
Down Articles
Down IP in Review
Down In Person


[Search ALL Issues]


Front Matter (PDF) | Back Matter (PDF) | Table of Contents (PDF)

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.

Editorial Back

Jeremy Phillips
Information overload and IP practice
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 301; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp049 [Extract] [FREE Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

JIPLP Express Back

JIPLP Express: A rapid-read overview of the main items in this issue
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 302-304; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp050 [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Current Intelligence Back

Alfonso Calles Sánchez
Implementing paediatric extensions to SPCs: marketing authorization in ‘all Member States’
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 24, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 305-306; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Ewan Nettleton
EPO's Enlarged Board rules on patenting stem cell inventions
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 306-308; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Eddy D. Ventose
The standard of proof applicable to substantive examination of UK patents
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 19, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 308-310; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Charles R. Macedo
Permanent injunction affirmed in US patent case
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 19, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 310-312; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Chiara Ortolani
The function of phonetic similarity in analysis of the likelihood of confusion
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 19, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 312-314; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Birgit Clark
Hooray for Hollywood? (No) trade mark protection for Marlene Dietrich's image
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on April 1, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 314-316; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Marieke Poulie
Does the shape of the Mini Maglite torch have distinctive character?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 316-317; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Kate Duckworth
The end of the essential feature test?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 24, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 317-319; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Kristof Neefs
Competition and collecting societies: switch the channel, change the royalty rate?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 19, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 319-321; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Nick Owers
Term of protection of copyright-related rights in the EC
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 321-322; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Lee-Ann Tong
South African Supreme Court of Appeal interprets ‘course of employment’ for copyright
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 19, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 323-324; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

State of the Art Back

Arnaud Folliard-Monguiral and David Rogers
Significant 2008 case law on the Community trade mark from the ECJ and the CFI
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 12, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 325-340; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Practice Point Back

Dávid Adamov, Barna Fazekas, and Krisztián Tivadar
Damages in trade mark infringement litigation: a comparative analysis of the Hungarian, other European, and US jurisdictions
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 12, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 341-346; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Articles Back

Sebastian Moore and Duncan Ribbons
The Court of Appeal clarifies the law on sufficiency
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 18, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 347-352; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Tomasz Rychlicki, Adam Zielinski, and Grzegorz ‘DJ TWISTER’ Czerkasow
Sampling and scratching in US copyright and Polish law: a comparative analysis
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 353-359; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Supplementary Data] [Request Permissions]  

Marcin Ozóg
Stalinskaya: the uneasy case of offensive trade mark registration
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 19, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 360-364; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Mohammad Amin Naser
The Lanham Act and the trade mark monopoly phobia
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published on March 18, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 365-375; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

IP in Review Back

Phillip Johnson
The little book is back
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 376-377; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp040 [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Shireen Smith
An excellent resource ...
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 377; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp041 [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

In Person Back

Ventsi Stoilov
In Person
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4: 378; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp043 [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.