Skip Navigation



Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access published online on May 17, 2009

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp071
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/7/473    most recent
jpp071v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Intellectual property and joint ventures: protection of intellectual property on exit

Nigel Parker*
Legal context: Businesses are concerned about the risk of losing control over IP when conducting a JV or upon a JV's termination. It is best to address this risk from the outset. Issues relating to the division of ownership and exploitation of IP rights after expiry of a JV are inseparable from those relating to the division of other rights and assets of the JV, so it is important to focus on the corporate structure of the JV as well as the terms of any specific IP licence, assignment, or other agreement. IP owners can use the licensing terms and JV structure to reduce the risk of a loss of control of its IP both during and upon termination of a JV.

Key points: This article examines (i) the issues to be considered by an IP owner planning to enter into a JV, together with strategies to minimize the risk of losing control of IP, particularly on exit, (ii) from an IP owner's perspective, different JV structures and exit mechanisms, and (ii) key licensing structures and terms in the context of JVs. It emphasizes the importance of protecting other assets of a JV in addition to IP.

Practical significance: As the credit crunch and the economic downturn leads many businesses, keen to maximize revenues from existing sources, to give increased attention to IP portfolios, the JV is expected to become an increasingly popular model for achieving growth. Businesses, however, are increasingly concerned about losing control over IP when conducting a JV or upon a JV's termination.


Correspondence: * Allen & Overy. Email: nigel.parker{at}allenovery.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.