Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4(8):532-533; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp105
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Current Intelligence

German automaker wins crucial design patent case in China

Horace Lam and Albert Tsui
Lovells LLP, Beijing

Neoplan GmbH v Zonda Industrial Group of Companies, Yancheng Zhongwei Bus & Coach Company Limited and others, Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court, China, unreported, 14 January 2009

In this design patent infringement case, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court ruled against two local companies and awarded a German bus maker approximately RMB 20 million in damages, a considerably high amount for a case involving a non-Chinese party in China. In addition to the unusual large damages, the court appointed an automobile expert to sit on the judges' panel despite the usual protocol that panel members be randomly selected from a qualified pool.


Correspondence: Email: horace.lam{at}lovells.com

Correspondence: Email: albert.tsui{at}lovells.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.