Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
JIPLP Express |
JIPLP Express
A rapid-read overview of the main items in this issue
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Current Intelligence |
|---|
Patents
Exclusion and objection to Board Members at the European Patent Office. The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) has clarified the applicable principles relating to the exclusion and objection to members of the Technical Boards of Appeal or the EBA at the European Patent Office. (p. 526)
Is it possible to review a decision of the Examining Division to correct an ‘obvious mistake’? A European Patent Office Board of Appeal decided that neither the Boards of Appeal nor the Opposition Division were competent to review a decision of the Examining Division that an error in its decision is an obvious mistake and may be corrected under Rule 89 EPC 1973. This leads to the situation that if, after the Opposition Division has revoked a patent, a proprietor successfully requests the Examining Division to amend the claims under Rule 88 EPC 1973 and thus its grant decision under Rule 89 EPC 1973,
Trade marks
Copyright
|
Practice Point |
|---|
Reasonable royalties and the sale of patent rights (p. 545)
|
Articles |
|---|
Securitization of patents and trade marks: the Polish perspective in comparative perspective (p. 549)
The symbiotic relationship between global contracts and the international IP regime (p. 559)
The reform of Article 82 and the operation of competition principles upon the normal trading functions of copyright collecting societies (p. 566)
Protection of public interests through a human rights framework in the TRIPS Agreement: realities and challenges (p. 573)
May authorship go objective? (p. 583)
How prepared is the Indian entertainment industry to tackle the challenges posed by Web 2.0? (p. 592)
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?