Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(6):351-352; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn076
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Current Intelligence

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


   Current intelligence – by subject
 
Patents
 EPO decision computer-implemented inventions and the treatment of non-technical aspects(Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system—ex parte Board 3.5.01, T-0688/05, European Patent Office, of 19 September 2007)352

Trade marks
 Out of circulation: no trade mark infringement of goods in transit (Eli Lilly & Company and Lilly Icos LLC v 8PM Chemist Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 24, Court of Appeal for England and Wales, 5 February 2008)353

. . . [Full Text of this Article]

Copyright
General

   Current intelligence – by jurisdiction
 
ECJ
EPO
Canada
China
UK
US

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?