Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(6):348-350; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

JIPLP Express

JIPLP Express

A rapid-read overview of the main items in this issue

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


    Current Intelligence
 
Patents
EPO decision on computer-implemented inventions and the treatment of non-technical aspects. This decision considers how to treat non-technical features in an assessment of inventive step in the field of computer-implemented inventions. (p. 352)

Trade marks
Out of circulation: no trade mark infringement of goods in transit. Pharmaceutical goods brought into the UK under an inward processing procedure from Turkey for distribution to US customers were not in free circulation in the UK and so were not infringing UK trade mark rights. (p. 353)

Boxing clever or rope-a-dope? The drugs repackaging rumble is going the distance. The Court of Appeal for England and Wales resumed, following judgment by the European Court of Justice (‘the ECJ’) in April 2007 on questions it had referred to the ECJ, the hearing of certain appeals and cross-appeals against two High Court decisions concerning alleged trade mark infringement through co-branding or . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Copyright
General

    Practice Point
 
A new era in the adjudication of IP cases in Taiwan (p. 364)

    Articles
 
Supreme Court opens courthouse door to more patent challenges, but limitations on declaratory judgment jurisdiction remain (p. 369)
Some clarity, some confusion: 12 P&G v Reckitt Benckiser decisions help explain registered Community designs (p. 376)
Why America needs a European fashion police (p. 386)
Legal questions about illegal art (p. 393)
Duration of patent protection: does one size fit all? (p. 402)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?