Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(11):677; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn181
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Editorial

The great unread

Jeremy Phillips
The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

It has sometimes been said of IP rights that one of their prime roles is to affect the flow of information. Thus the laws of trade secrecy and confidentiality guard against the unauthorized disclosure or exploitation of something—a fact, an idea, a technique, or an aspiration—that has not been committed into the hands of the world at large. Patent laws work in the opposite direction, to force the disclosure of detailed . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?