Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2007 2(1):1; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl194
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/1    most recent
jpl194v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Editorial

Double-dipping

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

On 2 October last, the US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Aero Products International Inc. and Chaffee v Intex Recreation Corp., Quality Trading Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. that the award by a jury of damages for both patent and trade mark infringement, in respect of the sale of a patented product bearing a trade mark (the ONE TOUCH air mattress), was impermissible because it resulted in part from double accounting. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?