Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4(7):455-457; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp086
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAviney, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Current Intelligence

Ever broader border controls?

Stephanie McAviney
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy LLP

Council Regulation 1383/2003 [2003] OJ L196/7; General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (‘GATT’) Article V; Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (‘TRIPs’) Article 51, 15 April 1994.

There has been substantial political fallout from the recent in-transit detention of generic medicines by the Dutch customs authorities on suspicion of an infringement of patent rights under Council Regulation 1383/2003.

Correspondence: Email: smcaviney{at}milbank.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.