Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on April 22, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4(6):398-399; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/6/398    most recent
jpp060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Safiyuddin, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Current Intelligence

Bombay High Court recognizes a distinction between a ‘house mark’ and a ‘product identification mark’

Mustafa Safiyuddin
Legasis Partners, Mumbai

Parle Products Private Limited v Parle Agro Private Limited [Suit No.3203 of 2007], Bombay High Court, Roshan Dalvi J., 18 December 2008

The Bombay High Court has confirmed the legal distinction between a house mark and a brand name when considering questions of infringement/passing off and the likelihood of confusion among the relevant public.

Correspondence: Email: mustafa.safiyuddin{at}legasispartners.in


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.