Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on September 13, 2009
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4(11):798-808; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpp145
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/11/798    most recent
jpp145v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schankerman, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Improving patent incentives and enforcement

Mark Schankerman*
Legal context: This paper examines the argument that patenting has become an impediment to innovative activity, rather than the incentive it was originally designed to be.

Key points: Using economic analysis and empirical evidence, I take up three main issues: deterioration in the quality of patents issues, with ‘weak patents’ unlikely to be enforced by courts if challenged; patent thickets, where firms must secure license agreements from many patentees in order to undertake R&D; and the costs of enforcing patent rights.

Practical significance: The analysis leads to five main policy recommendations: 1) an opposition procedure in the patent office, 2) a mechanism for third-party provision of information on relevant prior art, 3) a substantial increase in patent renewal fees to generate a progressive tax on patent rights, 4) an effective, market-based system of patent litigation insurance, and 5) a centralized patent court to increase predictability of patent enforcement.


Correspondence: * Professor of Economics, London School of Economics. This article is an expanded version of my 2007 Beesley Lecture on Regulation given at the Institute for Directors, and sponsored by the London Business School, and on a lecture given at the AIPPI-UK in 2008. I am grateful to Alberto Galasso, Justin Watts, and Leonard Waverman for helpful comments on earlier versions of this work. Email: m.schankerman{at}lse.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.