Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on November 11, 2008
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2009 4(1):51-56; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn209
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/1/51    most recent
jpn209v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helmer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© CMS Cameron McKenna LLP (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

File-sharing and downloading: goldmine or minefield?

Stuart Helmer and Isabel Davies*
Legal context: Major copyright owners have been slow to rise to the challenge presented by illegal file-sharing and downloading. In recent years, they have scored a number of significant Court victories against file-sharers, but the recent decision in Promusicae v Telefónica, in which the ECJ held that the right to the protection of industrial property does not necessarily outweigh the right to privacy, indicates that rights holders may benefit from a more creative and co-operative approach to file-sharing.

Key points: The author provides an analysis of the Promusicae decision, along with a summary of the statutory position in the UK. This is also accompanied by a review of the recent international litigation landscape on file-sharing and a review of current attitudes towards addressing illegal filesharing, including recent proposals from the British Government and the European Parliament and new models of co-operation between rights holders and file-sharing service providers.

Practical significance: The Promusicae decision will disappoint copyright owners. The ECJ decision left it to Member States to determine whether there should be an obligation to disclose personal data in order to protect copyright, so long as the interpretation of the law attempts to reconcile the parties' competing rights and principles and demonstrates proportionality. Copyright owners will, therefore, have to tailor enforcement strategies to individual Member States. This will hamper their ability to take action against individual infringers efficiently. In addition to litigating against infringers, however, they may benefit from the new models of co-operation between copyright owners and file-sharing services which are emerging.

Correspondence: * Solicitor and partner, respectively, CMS Cameron McKenna LLP. Email: stuart.helmer{at}cms-cmck.com and isabel.davies{at}cms-cmck.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.