Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on June 12, 2008
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(8):493-496; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn110
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
3/8/493    most recent
jpn110v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karet, I.
Right arrow Articles by Batteson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Staying the course?

Ian Karet and Alex Batteson
Linklaters LLP, London

Glaxo Group v Genentech Inc and Biogen Idec Inc [2008] EWCA Civ 23, Court of Appeal, 31 January 2008

The Court of Appeal for England and Wales has given guidance on the approach to granting stays of English patent proceedings where there are pending opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office.

Correspondence: Email: ian.karet{at}linklaters.com Email: alex.batteson{at}linklaters.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.