Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on May 29, 2008
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(7):427-428; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn091
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
3/7/427    most recent
jpn091v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

The Canadian prohibition against registrability of words clearly descriptive of origin

Toni Polson Ashton
Sim & Mcburney Sim, Lowman, Ashton & Mckay LLP, Toronto

Sociedad Agricola Santa Teresa Ltda et al. v Vina Leyda Limitada (2007) 63 CPR (4th) 321, para 4; 9; 10

The practice of the Canadian Trade marks Office to judge registrability based upon a test of first impression of the everyday Canadian user of the wares may be in question.

Correspondence: Email: harris{at}sim-mcburney.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.