Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on March 19, 2008
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(5):279-281; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpn050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
3/5/279    most recent
jpn050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peberdy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Computer program claims held patentable in the UK

Morag Peberdy and Andrew Bailey
Herbert Smith LLP, London
Email: andrew.bailey{at}herbertsmith.com

Astron Clinica Limited and others v Comptroller General of Patents [2008] EWHC 85 (Pat)

Where claims for computer implemented methods and apparatus are valid, in principle an equivalent claim to the program itself should be allowable.

Correspondence: Email: morag.peberdy{at}herbertsmith.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.