Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on July 25, 2007
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2007 2(9):586-588; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpm124
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/9/586    most recent
jpm124v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lederman, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Use (you) snooze you lose

Robyn S. Lederman
Senior Trademark Counsel
Cantor Colburn LLP, Troy, MI, USA

L. & J.G. Stickley, Inc. v Ronald C. Cosser 11 January 2007, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) opinion in Cancellation Proceeding No. 92040202

Two registrations were cancelled based on analogous use where the petitioner for cancellation established priority and met the burden of proof to rebut the presumption of validity by preponderance of evidence.

Correspondence: Email: rlederman{at}cantorcolburn.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.