Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2007
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2007 2(9):581-582; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpm127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/9/581    most recent
jpm127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stenton, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

‘Donuts’—lost in translation?

Gavin Stenton
Manches LLP, Oxford

House of Donuts International v OHIM, Joined cases T-333/04 and T-334/04, Court of First Instance of the European Communities, 18 April 2007

Finding that the word ‘donut(s)’ was neither generic nor descriptive in the Spanish language, the Court of First Instance (CFI) concluded that this word could constitute the distinctive and dominant component of two figurative Community trade mark (CTM) applications, each of which was found to give rise to a likelihood of confusion with several prior Spanish registrations for ‘DONUT’ (word) and ‘donuts’ (figurative).

Correspondence: Email: gavin.stenton{at}manches.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.