Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2007
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2007 2(2):67-69; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/67    most recent
jpl217v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elsborg, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

CFI decision leaves Bitte taste for Bitburger

Natalie Elsborg
Trowers & Hamlins, London
Email: nelsborg{at}trowers.com

Bitburger Brauerei Th. Simon GmbH v OHIM, Joined Cases T-350/04 to T-352/04, Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), 19 October 2006

Bitburger's over-reliance on its brand strength and lack of substantive evidence of similarities between its own marks and the contested marks meant that it failed again to prevent Anheuser-Busch selling its beer under the name ‘Bud’ in Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.