Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2007 2(1):8-10; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl196
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Roeyen, G. S.C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

I wonder if this is a Wunderbaum

Gino S.C.M. van Roeyen
Banning Advocaten, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Email: g.vanroeyen{at}banning.nl

L&D SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Julius Sämann Ltd, Case T-168/04, Court of First Instance of the European Communities, 7 September 2006

The Court of First Instance, dismissing a Community trade mark applicant's appeal against the decision to allow an opposition in part, affirms that the public's recognition of the opponent's earlier Community trade mark may be assessed in relation to the degree of recognition achieved by that mark through its close similarity to an earlier national registered trade mark belonging to the opponent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.