Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on December 19, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2007 2(1):11-12; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl203
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/11    most recent
jpl203v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Trade mark invalidated on ground of copyright infringement

Mena Lo and Florence Lam
Wilkinson & Grist, Hong Kong
Email: menalo{at}wilgrist.com

Registrar's Decision [Hong Kong, 15 August 2006]

The Registrar of Trade Marks ordered invalidation of a registered trade mark that was a copy of the whole of the applicant's mark ‘MAX BRENNER & Device’, where use of the disputed mark was liable to be prevented by the applicant's earlier copyright under the provisions of the Copyright Ordinance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.