Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on March 30, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006 1(6):376-377; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/6/376    most recent
jpl049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, P.
Right arrow Articles by Watts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Parallel imports from outside the EEA: CE marking does not constitute consent

Paul Joseph and Justin Watts
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (the authors acted for Roche.)

The High Court for England and Wales has ruled that a trade mark owner who marks products with the CE mark does not unequivocally consent to the marketing of those products in the EEA for trade mark purposes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.