Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on February 7, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006 1(4):240-242; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl012
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Current Intelligence |
Trade marks are possessionsbut applications are not (yet)
Lovells, Madrid
In its decision of 11 October 2005 the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that a registered trade mark was a possession within the meaning of Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights. The ECHR failed, however, to extend this level of protection to the particular trade mark application at issue, thereby leaving the protection of intellectual property rights as fundamental rights somewhat incomplete for the time being.