Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on November 14, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006 1(13):850-857; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl179
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press 2006. All rights reserved
The rise and fall of cross-border jurisdiction and remedies in IP disputes
Legal context. Companies which have seen their IP rights infringed across Europe have, in recent years, been keen to obtain cross-border relief from infringement through bringing a single action in the court of just one EU Member State. This approach has time, cost and tactical advantages for claimants, but raises complex jurisdictional questions.
Key points. This article provides an in-depth explanation of the framework for litigating IP rights in the European Union. It describes the various interpretations to which the Brussels Regulation on Jurisdiction has been subjected and how they affect the availability of cross-border relief. This explanation provides a foundation for analysing the recent ECJ decisions in Gat v Luk and Roche v Primus.
Practical significance. Cross-border jurisdiction and relief is, in practice, no longer available in respect of registered rights.
*Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer