Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on October 11, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006 1(12):758-760; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl162
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/12/758    most recent
jpl162v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

An illuminating case on the law of registered designs

Daniel Byrne
Hogarth Chambers, London

This case involving registered design rights has clarified the approach that courts will take in determining, inter alia, the validity of a registered design right when the purported proprietor is not entitled to that right and the characteristics of the ‘informed user’ when determining infringement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.