Skip Navigation

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006 1(12):749-751; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl163
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson-Kelly, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Current Intelligence

Australian court holds that sublicensor cannot validly assign brand management and termination rights

Colin Pearson and John Davidson-Kelly
Allen & Overy LLP London

In Pacific Brands Sport and Leisure Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd the Full Federal Court of Australia held that a sublicensor could not validly assign certain rights, including brand management rights and termination rights, to a third party because the nature of the rights was personal between the sublicensor and the sublicensee and the assignment of those rights required the sublicensee's consent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.