Skip Navigation


Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access originally published online on September 2, 2006
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006 1(11):732-739; doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl137
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/11/732    most recent
jpl137v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

The Vessel Hull Design Protection Act of 1998: is it still afloat?

Bradley J. Olson *

Legal context. The Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (‘VHDPA’ or ‘Act’) is a unique form of industrial design protection under US law, part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998. Congress provided this sui generis form of protection in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Bonito Boats v Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. This statute has been underutilized due to the difficulty in proving infringement, as unintended consequences were caused by the way ‘hull’ was originally defined under the Act. A bill is pending in Congress that addresses how a ‘hull’ is defined, eliminating any inclusion of ‘deck’ features, when passed, registrants should be able to pursue infringers with greater success.

Key points. The recreational boat manufacturing industry has been plagued by low-cost boat makers who think nothing of taking a competitor's boat hull design, and using it as a ‘plug’ to make a casting for their own unauthorized manufacturing use, a counterfeiting technique known in the trade as ‘splashing’ a hull. In the eight years since enactment, the boating industry has generally overlooked this form of intellectual property protection due to the difficulty in proving infringement—that is likely to change soon.

Practical significance. The Act includes the right to exclude others from making, having made, importing, offering for sale, or using in any trade, any boat hull embodying the protected hull design. The Act provides compensatory recovery for damages as well as injunctive relief. The newly revised Act has the potential to provide a low-cost and effective form of intellectual property protection for recreational boat manufacturers who build hulls from moulded fibreglass or similar materials.

*Dickstein Shapiro LLP, 1825 Eye Street, N.W., Washington, DC 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.